Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Omaha, NE vs Chicago, IL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Chicago spends 67.6% more per capita than Omaha ($23,371/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Omaha, NE
Pop. 489,201
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Chicago, IL
Pop. 2,721,914
C
61/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden61
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Omaha
Chicago
Total Spending
$5.5B
$94.0B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$34,551
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$231.6B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$85,083
Total Debt
$0
$2.7B
Debt / Capita
$0
$977
Population
489,201
2,721,914
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Chicago$10,754
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Chicago$930
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Chicago$122
Health
Omaha$456
Chicago$426

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

OmahaChicago
Property Tax
$624
$26
Sales Tax
$373
$74
Income Tax
$0
$229
Intergovernmental
$2,622
$85,083
Charges & Fees
$0
$2,847
Other
$4,672
$3,463

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

OmahaChicago
Fire Protection
$0
$10,754
Highways & Roads
$319
$930
Public Welfare
$1,521
$1,858
Health
$456
$426
Hospitals
$0
$1,444
Parks & Recreation
$742
$122
Housing
$3,045
$6,520
Sewerage
$0
$129
Utilities
$581
$2,983
Other
$4,516
$9,385
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Chicago, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities