Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Chicago, IL vs Omaha, NE

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Chicago spends 209.0% more per capita than Omaha ($23,371/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Chicago, IL
Pop. 2,721,914
C
61/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden61
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Omaha, NE
Pop. 489,201
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Chicago
Omaha
Total Spending
$94.0B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$34,551
$11,180
Total Revenue
$231.6B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$85,083
$26,929
Total Debt
$2.7B
$0
Debt / Capita
$977
$0
Population
2,721,914
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Chicago$10,754
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Chicago$930
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Chicago$122
Omaha$742
Health
Chicago$426
Omaha$456

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChicagoOmaha
Property Tax
$26
$624
Sales Tax
$74
$373
Income Tax
$229
$0
Intergovernmental
$85,083
$2,622
Charges & Fees
$2,847
$0
Other
$3,463
$4,672

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChicagoOmaha
Fire Protection
$10,754
$0
Highways & Roads
$930
$319
Public Welfare
$1,858
$1,521
Health
$426
$456
Hospitals
$1,444
$0
Parks & Recreation
$122
$742
Housing
$6,520
$3,045
Sewerage
$129
$0
Utilities
$2,983
$581
Other
$9,385
$4,516
C
Chicago, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health

Compare More Cities