Omaha, NE vs Boston, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Boston spends 84.5% more per capita than Omaha ($61,119/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
C
56/100
Budget Balance25
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Omaha
Boston
Total Spending
$5.5B
$48.1B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$72,299
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$20.8B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$31,243
Total Debt
$0
$296.3M
Debt / Capita
$0
$445
Population
489,201
665,945
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Boston$1,107
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Boston$594
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Boston$711
Education
Omaha$0
Boston$30,742
Health
Omaha$456
Boston$725
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaBoston
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $78 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $5,357 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,784 |
| Other | $4,672 | $4,557 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaBoston
| Fire Protection | $0 | $1,107 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $594 |
| Education | $0 | $30,742 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $1,110 |
| Health | $456 | $725 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,584 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $711 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $6,614 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $355 |
| Utilities | $581 | $3,402 |
| General Admin | $0 | $5,401 |
| Other | $4,516 | $18,955 |
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Boston, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health