Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Boston, MA vs Omaha, NE

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Boston spends 546.7% more per capita than Omaha ($61,119/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Boston, MA
Pop. 665,945
C
56/100
Budget Balance25
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Omaha, NE
Pop. 489,201
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Boston
Omaha
Total Spending
$48.1B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$72,299
$11,180
Total Revenue
$20.8B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$31,243
$26,929
Total Debt
$296.3M
$0
Debt / Capita
$445
$0
Population
665,945
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Boston$1,107
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Boston$594
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Boston$711
Omaha$742
Education
Boston$30,742
Omaha$0
Health
Boston$725
Omaha$456

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BostonOmaha
Property Tax
$0
$624
Sales Tax
$78
$373
Intergovernmental
$5,357
$2,622
Charges & Fees
$2,784
$0
Other
$4,557
$4,672

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BostonOmaha
Fire Protection
$1,107
$0
Highways & Roads
$594
$319
Education
$30,742
$0
Public Welfare
$1,110
$1,521
Health
$725
$456
Hospitals
$2,584
$0
Parks & Recreation
$711
$742
Housing
$6,614
$3,045
Sewerage
$355
$0
Utilities
$3,402
$581
General Admin
$5,401
$0
Other
$18,955
$4,516
C
Boston, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health

Compare More Cities