Omaha, NE vs Bellevue, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Omaha, NE outspends Bellevue, NE by a wide margin per resident — $11,180 versus $347, a 3118% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 80/100 (grade A) for Bellevue, NE — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas Bellevue, NE relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Omaha spends 3118.4% more per capita than Bellevue ($10,833/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $35 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $680 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $5,739 |
| Other | $4,672 | $1,887 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $0 |
| Health | $456 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $0 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $0 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $347 |
| Utilities | $581 | $0 |
| Other | $4,516 | $0 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.