Bellevue, NE vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Omaha, NE outspends Bellevue, NE by a wide margin per resident — $11,180 versus $347, a 3118% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 80/100 (grade A) for Bellevue, NE — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Bellevue, NE at 100% of total revenue, whereas Omaha, NE relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Omaha spends 96.9% more per capita than Bellevue ($10,833/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $35 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $680 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,739 | $2,622 |
| Other | $1,887 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $0 | $1,521 |
| Health | $0 | $456 |
| Parks & Recreation | $0 | $742 |
| Housing | $0 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $347 | $0 |
| Utilities | $0 | $581 |
| Other | $0 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.