Oklahoma City, OK vs Long Beach, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Long Beach, CA outspends Oklahoma City, OK by a wide margin per resident — $34,250 versus $18,074, a 90% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Long Beach, CA edges Oklahoma City, OK on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 67/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Long Beach, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Oklahoma City, OK carries $3,520 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Oklahoma City, OK at $2,014 per resident and in Long Beach, CA at $698.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Oklahoma City, OK at 19% of total revenue, whereas Long Beach, CA relies most on other revenue at 12%.
Summary
Long Beach spends 47.2% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($16,177/person difference). Long Beach, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $763 | $36 |
| Income Tax | $1,037 | $1,760 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,852 | $1,688 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,256 | $2,424 |
| Other | $1,836 | $8,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $513 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,525 | $1,317 |
| Health | $5 | $477 |
| Hospitals | $2,044 | $2,751 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,014 | $698 |
| Housing | $2,857 | $5,782 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $86 |
| Utilities | $4,523 | $3,889 |
| Interest on Debt | $707 | $2,718 |
| Other | $3,886 | $16,533 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.