Long Beach, CA vs Oklahoma City, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Long Beach, CA outspends Oklahoma City, OK by a wide margin per resident — $34,250 versus $18,074, a 90% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Long Beach, CA edges Oklahoma City, OK on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 67/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Long Beach, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Oklahoma City, OK carries $3,520 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Long Beach, CA at $698 per resident and in Oklahoma City, OK at $2,014.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Long Beach, CA at 12% of total revenue, whereas Oklahoma City, OK relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 19%.
Summary
Long Beach spends 89.5% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($16,177/person difference). Long Beach, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $36 | $763 |
| Income Tax | $1,760 | $1,037 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,688 | $6,852 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,424 | $3,256 |
| Other | $8,836 | $1,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $513 |
| Public Welfare | $1,317 | $1,525 |
| Health | $477 | $5 |
| Hospitals | $2,751 | $2,044 |
| Parks & Recreation | $698 | $2,014 |
| Housing | $5,782 | $2,857 |
| Sewerage | $86 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,889 | $4,523 |
| Interest on Debt | $2,718 | $707 |
| Other | $16,533 | $3,886 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.