Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Oklahoma City, OK vs Bakersfield, CA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Oklahoma City spends 56.1% more per capita than Bakersfield ($6,498/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Oklahoma City, OK
Pop. 681,088
B
65/100
Budget Balance80
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency97
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Oklahoma City
Bakersfield
Total Spending
$12.3B
$4.7B
Spending / Capita
$18,074
$11,576
Total Revenue
$23.9B
$1.6B
Revenue / Capita
$35,156
$3,862
Total Debt
$2.4B
$0
Debt / Capita
$3,520
$0
Population
681,088
404,321
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Oklahoma City$513
Bakersfield$0
Parks & Recreation
Oklahoma City$2,014
Bakersfield$741
Health
Oklahoma City$5
Bakersfield$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Oklahoma CityBakersfield
Property Tax
$0
$1
Sales Tax
$763
$20
Income Tax
$1,037
$1,909
Intergovernmental
$6,852
$3,862
Charges & Fees
$3,256
$1,024
Other
$1,836
$1,915

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Oklahoma CityBakersfield
Fire Protection
$513
$0
Public Welfare
$1,525
$840
Health
$5
$0
Hospitals
$2,044
$425
Parks & Recreation
$2,014
$741
Housing
$2,857
$3,391
Sewerage
$0
$265
Utilities
$4,523
$2,679
Interest on Debt
$707
$0
Other
$3,886
$3,234
B
Oklahoma City, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities