Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Bakersfield, CA vs Oklahoma City, OK

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Oklahoma City spends 36.0% more per capita than Bakersfield ($6,498/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Oklahoma City, OK
Pop. 681,088
B
65/100
Budget Balance80
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency97
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Bakersfield
Oklahoma City
Total Spending
$4.7B
$12.3B
Spending / Capita
$11,576
$18,074
Total Revenue
$1.6B
$23.9B
Revenue / Capita
$3,862
$35,156
Total Debt
$0
$2.4B
Debt / Capita
$0
$3,520
Population
404,321
681,088
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Bakersfield$0
Oklahoma City$513
Parks & Recreation
Bakersfield$741
Oklahoma City$2,014
Health
Bakersfield$0
Oklahoma City$5

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BakersfieldOklahoma City
Property Tax
$1
$0
Sales Tax
$20
$763
Income Tax
$1,909
$1,037
Intergovernmental
$3,862
$6,852
Charges & Fees
$1,024
$3,256
Other
$1,915
$1,836

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BakersfieldOklahoma City
Fire Protection
$0
$513
Public Welfare
$840
$1,525
Health
$0
$5
Hospitals
$425
$2,044
Parks & Recreation
$741
$2,014
Housing
$3,391
$2,857
Sewerage
$265
$0
Utilities
$2,679
$4,523
Interest on Debt
$0
$707
Other
$3,234
$3,886
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
B
Oklahoma City, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health

Compare More Cities