Oakland, CA vs Raleigh, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA outspends Raleigh, NC by a wide margin per resident — $30,055 versus $13,911, a 116% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Raleigh, NC edges Oakland, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 76/100 (grade B) to 72/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Raleigh, NC carries $906 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016 per resident, while Raleigh, NC leads with parks and recreation at $1,391.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Oakland, CA and 47% in Raleigh, NC.
Summary
Oakland spends 116.0% more per capita than Raleigh ($16,144/person difference). Raleigh, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 76/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $522 | $858 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $806 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $14,128 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,681 |
| Other | $4,337 | $4,740 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1 | $277 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $448 |
| Education | $0 | $6 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $498 |
| Health | $1,016 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $669 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $1,391 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $2,712 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $281 |
| Utilities | $0 | $2,469 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,513 |
| Other | $13,929 | $3,646 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.