Oakland, CA vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Oakland spends 37.2% more per capita than Minneapolis ($8,145/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $522 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,040 |
| Other | $4,337 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $1,500 |
| Health | $1,016 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $570 |
| Utilities | $0 | $2,398 |
| Other | $13,929 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.