Oakland, CA vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA spends 37% more per resident than Minneapolis, MN: $30,055 against $21,910. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Oakland, CA edges Minneapolis, MN on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 72/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016 per resident, while Minneapolis, MN leads with parks and recreation at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Oakland, CA at 100% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Oakland spends 37.2% more per capita than Minneapolis ($8,145/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $522 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,040 |
| Other | $4,337 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $1,500 |
| Health | $1,016 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $570 |
| Utilities | $0 | $2,398 |
| Other | $13,929 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.