Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Oakland, CA vs Columbus, OH

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Oakland spends 59.4% more per capita than Columbus ($11,196/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Oakland, CA
Pop. 437,825
B
72/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency43
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Columbus, OH
Pop. 902,449
C
52/100
Budget Balance32
Debt Burden46
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency94
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Oakland
Columbus
Total Spending
$13.2B
$17.0B
Spending / Capita
$30,055
$18,858
Total Revenue
$18.5B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$42,277
$0
Total Debt
$0
$1.0B
Debt / Capita
$0
$1,145
Population
437,825
902,449
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Oakland$1
Columbus$1,016
Highways & Roads
Oakland$0
Columbus$224
Parks & Recreation
Oakland$955
Columbus$2,168
Health
Oakland$1,016
Columbus$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

OaklandColumbus
Property Tax
$0
$10
Sales Tax
$522
$234
Income Tax
$0
$1
Intergovernmental
$42,277
$0
Charges & Fees
$0
$2,389
Other
$4,337
$5,248

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

OaklandColumbus
Fire Protection
$1
$1,016
Highways & Roads
$0
$224
Public Welfare
$2,426
$878
Health
$1,016
$0
Hospitals
$2,498
$953
Parks & Recreation
$955
$2,168
Housing
$7,811
$4,303
Sewerage
$1,417
$1
Utilities
$0
$1,719
Other
$13,929
$7,595
B
Oakland, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 72/100
Good fiscal health
C
Columbus, OH
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities