Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Columbus, OH vs Oakland, CA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Oakland spends 37.3% more per capita than Columbus ($11,196/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Columbus, OH
Pop. 902,449
C
52/100
Budget Balance32
Debt Burden46
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency94
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Oakland, CA
Pop. 437,825
B
72/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency43
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Columbus
Oakland
Total Spending
$17.0B
$13.2B
Spending / Capita
$18,858
$30,055
Total Revenue
$0
$18.5B
Revenue / Capita
$0
$42,277
Total Debt
$1.0B
$0
Debt / Capita
$1,145
$0
Population
902,449
437,825
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Columbus$1,016
Oakland$1
Highways & Roads
Columbus$224
Oakland$0
Parks & Recreation
Columbus$2,168
Oakland$955
Health
Columbus$0
Oakland$1,016

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

ColumbusOakland
Property Tax
$10
$0
Sales Tax
$234
$522
Income Tax
$1
$0
Intergovernmental
$0
$42,277
Charges & Fees
$2,389
$0
Other
$5,248
$4,337

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

ColumbusOakland
Fire Protection
$1,016
$1
Highways & Roads
$224
$0
Public Welfare
$878
$2,426
Health
$0
$1,016
Hospitals
$953
$2,498
Parks & Recreation
$2,168
$955
Housing
$4,303
$7,811
Sewerage
$1
$1,417
Utilities
$1,719
$0
Other
$7,595
$13,929
C
Columbus, OH
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health
B
Oakland, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 72/100
Good fiscal health

Compare More Cities