Oakland, CA vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA outspends Colorado Springs, CO by a wide margin per resident — $30,055 versus $13,222, a 127% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Oakland, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 72/100 (grade B) against 59/100 (grade C) for Colorado Springs, CO — a 13-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016 per resident, while Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Oakland, CA and 13% in Colorado Springs, CO.
Summary
Oakland spends 127.3% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($16,832/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $522 | $257 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $5,676 |
| Other | $4,337 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1 | $1,266 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $575 |
| Health | $1,016 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $376 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $2,713 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $0 |
| Utilities | $0 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $190 |
| Other | $13,929 | $5,120 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.