Colorado Springs, CO vs Oakland, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Oakland spends 56.0% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($16,832/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
B
72/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency43
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Colorado Springs
Oakland
Total Spending
$6.3B
$13.2B
Spending / Capita
$13,222
$30,055
Total Revenue
$25.3B
$18.5B
Revenue / Capita
$52,777
$42,277
Total Debt
$1.5B
$0
Debt / Capita
$3,063
$0
Population
479,612
437,825
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Colorado Springs$1,266
Oakland$1
Parks & Recreation
Colorado Springs$376
Oakland$955
Health
Colorado Springs$0
Oakland$1,016
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
Colorado SpringsOakland
| Sales Tax | $257 | $522 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $42,277 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $0 |
| Other | $2,678 | $4,337 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
Colorado SpringsOakland
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $1 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $2,426 |
| Health | $0 | $1,016 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $2,498 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $955 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $7,811 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $1,417 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $0 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $13,929 |
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health
B
Oakland, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 72/100
Good fiscal health