Oakland, CA vs Albuquerque, NM
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA outspends Albuquerque, NM by a wide margin per resident — $30,055 versus $17,237, a 74% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Albuquerque, NM holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 81/100 (grade A) against 72/100 (grade B) for Oakland, CA — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Albuquerque, NM carries $613 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016 per resident, while Albuquerque, NM leads with parks and recreation at $1,990.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Oakland, CA at 100% of total revenue, whereas Albuquerque, NM relies most on charges and fees at 11%.
Summary
Oakland spends 74.4% more per capita than Albuquerque ($12,817/person difference). Albuquerque, NM has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 81/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $36 |
| Sales Tax | $522 | $355 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,580 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $1,897 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,633 |
| Other | $4,337 | $2,174 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1 | $440 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $172 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $419 |
| Health | $1,016 | $291 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $328 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $1,990 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $4,080 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $0 |
| Utilities | $0 | $5,212 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,096 |
| Other | $13,929 | $3,209 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.