Albuquerque, NM vs Oakland, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA outspends Albuquerque, NM by a wide margin per resident — $30,055 versus $17,237, a 74% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Albuquerque, NM holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 81/100 (grade A) against 72/100 (grade B) for Oakland, CA — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Albuquerque, NM carries $613 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Albuquerque, NM leads with parks and recreation at $1,990 per resident, while Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Albuquerque, NM at 11% of total revenue, whereas Oakland, CA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Oakland spends 42.6% more per capita than Albuquerque ($12,817/person difference). Albuquerque, NM has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 81/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $36 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $355 | $522 |
| Income Tax | $1,580 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,897 | $42,277 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,633 | $0 |
| Other | $2,174 | $4,337 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $440 | $1 |
| Highways & Roads | $172 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $419 | $2,426 |
| Health | $291 | $1,016 |
| Hospitals | $328 | $2,498 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,990 | $955 |
| Housing | $4,080 | $7,811 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $1,417 |
| Utilities | $5,212 | $0 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,096 | $0 |
| Other | $3,209 | $13,929 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.