New Orleans, LA vs Lake Charles, LA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
New Orleans, LA outspends Lake Charles, LA by a wide margin per resident — $32,984 versus $12,552, a 163% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Lake Charles, LA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 73/100 (grade B) against 52/100 (grade C) for New Orleans, LA — a 21-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Lake Charles, LA carries the lighter load at $4 per resident versus $2,288 for New Orleans, LA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: New Orleans, LA leads with fire protection at $1,044 per resident, while Lake Charles, LA leads with parks and recreation at $737.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in New Orleans, LA at 18% of total revenue, whereas Lake Charles, LA relies most on charges and fees at 27%.
Summary
New Orleans spends 162.8% more per capita than Lake Charles ($20,432/person difference). Lake Charles, LA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 73/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $62 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $327 | $38 |
| Income Tax | $993 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,013 | $10 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,241 | $1,751 |
| Other | $5,501 | $1,431 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,044 | $240 |
| Highways & Roads | $271 | $204 |
| Education | $951 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,197 | $543 |
| Health | $507 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $5,002 | $1,466 |
| Parks & Recreation | $966 | $737 |
| Housing | $4,479 | $2,714 |
| Sewerage | $161 | $0 |
| Utilities | $4,300 | $1,918 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $435 |
| General Admin | $1,865 | $0 |
| Other | $12,243 | $4,296 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.