Lake Charles, LA vs New Orleans, LA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
New Orleans, LA outspends Lake Charles, LA by a wide margin per resident — $32,984 versus $12,552, a 163% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Lake Charles, LA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 73/100 (grade B) against 52/100 (grade C) for New Orleans, LA — a 21-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Lake Charles, LA carries the lighter load at $4 per resident versus $2,288 for New Orleans, LA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Lake Charles, LA leads with parks and recreation at $737 per resident, while New Orleans, LA leads with fire protection at $1,044.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Lake Charles, LA at 27% of total revenue, whereas New Orleans, LA relies most on other revenue at 18%.
Summary
New Orleans spends 61.9% more per capita than Lake Charles ($20,432/person difference). Lake Charles, LA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 73/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $62 |
| Sales Tax | $38 | $327 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $993 |
| Intergovernmental | $10 | $3,013 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,751 | $3,241 |
| Other | $1,431 | $5,501 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $240 | $1,044 |
| Highways & Roads | $204 | $271 |
| Education | $0 | $951 |
| Public Welfare | $543 | $1,197 |
| Health | $0 | $507 |
| Hospitals | $1,466 | $5,002 |
| Parks & Recreation | $737 | $966 |
| Housing | $2,714 | $4,479 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $161 |
| Utilities | $1,918 | $4,300 |
| Interest on Debt | $435 | $0 |
| General Admin | $0 | $1,865 |
| Other | $4,296 | $12,243 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.