Nampa, ID vs Idaho Falls, ID
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Idaho Falls, ID spends 33% more per resident than Nampa, ID: $14,232 against $10,687. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Nampa, ID holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 54/100 (grade C) against 41/100 (grade D) for Idaho Falls, ID — a 13-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Nampa, ID carries the lighter load at $480 per resident versus $641 for Idaho Falls, ID. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Nampa, ID at $1,867 per resident and in Idaho Falls, ID at $2,249.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Nampa, ID at 70% of total revenue, whereas Idaho Falls, ID relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Idaho Falls spends 24.9% more per capita than Nampa ($3,545/person difference). Nampa, ID has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 54/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1 | $77 |
| Sales Tax | $1,733 | $990 |
| Income Tax | $1,453 | $897 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,494 | $10,285 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,859 | $2,201 |
| Other | $3,946 | $3,106 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $182 | $281 |
| Highways & Roads | $198 | $226 |
| Education | $32 | $232 |
| Public Welfare | $725 | $1,182 |
| Health | $215 | $468 |
| Hospitals | $407 | $874 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,867 | $2,249 |
| Housing | $2,657 | $2,890 |
| Sewerage | $593 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,346 | $1,518 |
| Other | $1,466 | $4,312 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.