Idaho Falls, ID vs Nampa, ID
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Idaho Falls, ID spends 33% more per resident than Nampa, ID: $14,232 against $10,687. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Nampa, ID holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 54/100 (grade C) against 41/100 (grade D) for Idaho Falls, ID — a 13-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Nampa, ID carries the lighter load at $480 per resident versus $641 for Idaho Falls, ID. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Idaho Falls, ID at $2,249 per resident and in Nampa, ID at $1,867.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Idaho Falls, ID at 100% of total revenue, whereas Nampa, ID relies most on other revenue at 70%.
Summary
Idaho Falls spends 33.2% more per capita than Nampa ($3,545/person difference). Nampa, ID has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 54/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $77 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $990 | $1,733 |
| Income Tax | $897 | $1,453 |
| Intergovernmental | $10,285 | $3,494 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,201 | $1,859 |
| Other | $3,106 | $3,946 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $281 | $182 |
| Highways & Roads | $226 | $198 |
| Education | $232 | $32 |
| Public Welfare | $1,182 | $725 |
| Health | $468 | $215 |
| Hospitals | $874 | $407 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,249 | $1,867 |
| Housing | $2,890 | $2,657 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $593 |
| Utilities | $1,518 | $2,346 |
| Other | $4,312 | $1,466 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.