Mount Pleasant, SC vs Greenville, SC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Greenville, SC outspends Mount Pleasant, SC by a wide margin per resident — $43,093 versus $12,111, a 256% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Mount Pleasant, SC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 70/100 (grade B) against 46/100 (grade D) for Greenville, SC — a 24-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Greenville, SC reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mount Pleasant, SC carries $925 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Mount Pleasant, SC leads with parks and recreation at $963 per resident, while Greenville, SC leads with police at $4,914.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 23% of total revenue in Mount Pleasant, SC and 100% in Greenville, SC.
Summary
Greenville spends 71.9% more per capita than Mount Pleasant ($30,982/person difference). Mount Pleasant, SC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,988 |
| Sales Tax | $437 | $643 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,116 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,212 | $17,967 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,912 | $0 |
| Other | $3,395 | $4,746 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $4,914 |
| Fire Protection | $399 | $2,341 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $842 |
| Public Welfare | $623 | $1,226 |
| Health | $0 | $3,014 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $159 |
| Parks & Recreation | $963 | $2,637 |
| Housing | $2,205 | $11,807 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $551 |
| Utilities | $3,710 | $3,041 |
| Other | $4,211 | $12,562 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.