Greenville, SC vs Mount Pleasant, SC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Greenville, SC outspends Mount Pleasant, SC by a wide margin per resident — $43,093 versus $12,111, a 256% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Mount Pleasant, SC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 70/100 (grade B) against 46/100 (grade D) for Greenville, SC — a 24-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Greenville, SC reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mount Pleasant, SC carries $925 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Greenville, SC leads with police at $4,914 per resident, while Mount Pleasant, SC leads with parks and recreation at $963.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Greenville, SC and 23% in Mount Pleasant, SC.
Summary
Greenville spends 255.8% more per capita than Mount Pleasant ($30,982/person difference). Mount Pleasant, SC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,988 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $643 | $437 |
| Income Tax | $1,116 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $17,967 | $6,212 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,912 |
| Other | $4,746 | $3,395 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $4,914 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,341 | $399 |
| Highways & Roads | $842 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,226 | $623 |
| Health | $3,014 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $159 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,637 | $963 |
| Housing | $11,807 | $2,205 |
| Sewerage | $551 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,041 | $3,710 |
| Other | $12,562 | $4,211 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.