Missoula, MT vs Great Falls, MT
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Missoula spends 60.0% more per capita than Great Falls ($5,196/person difference). Missoula, MT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 89/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $8 | $48 |
| Sales Tax | $218 | $595 |
| Income Tax | $55 | $882 |
| Intergovernmental | $885 | $10,814 |
| Charges & Fees | $74 | $2,342 |
| Other | $2,405 | $2,571 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,547 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $353 | $251 |
| Highways & Roads | $289 | $0 |
| Education | $31 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $809 | $755 |
| Health | $493 | $229 |
| Hospitals | $520 | $525 |
| Parks & Recreation | $464 | $1,064 |
| Housing | $3,124 | $1,988 |
| Sewerage | $129 | $0 |
| Utilities | $856 | $1,755 |
| Other | $4,238 | $2,089 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.