Great Falls, MT vs Missoula, MT
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Missoula spends 37.5% more per capita than Great Falls ($5,196/person difference). Missoula, MT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 89/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $48 | $8 |
| Sales Tax | $595 | $218 |
| Income Tax | $882 | $55 |
| Intergovernmental | $10,814 | $885 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,342 | $74 |
| Other | $2,571 | $2,405 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $2,547 |
| Fire Protection | $251 | $353 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $289 |
| Education | $0 | $31 |
| Public Welfare | $755 | $809 |
| Health | $229 | $493 |
| Hospitals | $525 | $520 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,064 | $464 |
| Housing | $1,988 | $3,124 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $129 |
| Utilities | $1,755 | $856 |
| Other | $2,089 | $4,238 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.