Minneapolis, MN vs Maple Grove, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Maple Grove, MN by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $9,443, a 132% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Maple Grove, MN edges Minneapolis, MN on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 70/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $1,424 for Maple Grove, MN. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486 per resident and in Maple Grove, MN at $1,695.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Minneapolis, MN at 17% of total revenue, whereas Maple Grove, MN relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 16%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 132.0% more per capita than Maple Grove ($12,467/person difference). Maple Grove, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $312 |
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $679 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $215 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $2,195 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $505 |
| Other | $3,254 | $1,419 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $683 | $367 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $1,195 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $205 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $1,695 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $2,285 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $1,393 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $479 |
| Other | $8,919 | $1,824 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.