Maple Grove, MN vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Maple Grove, MN by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $9,443, a 132% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Maple Grove, MN edges Minneapolis, MN on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 70/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $1,424 for Maple Grove, MN. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Maple Grove, MN at $1,695 per resident and in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Maple Grove, MN at 16% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 56.9% more per capita than Maple Grove ($12,467/person difference). Maple Grove, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $312 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $679 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $215 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,195 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $505 | $2,040 |
| Other | $1,419 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $367 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $1,195 | $1,500 |
| Hospitals | $205 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,695 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $2,285 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $570 |
| Utilities | $1,393 | $2,398 |
| Interest on Debt | $479 | $0 |
| Other | $1,824 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.