Minneapolis, MN vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Minneapolis, MN by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $21,910, a 98% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Minneapolis, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Minneapolis, MN leads with parks and recreation at $3,486 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 17% of total revenue in Minneapolis, MN and 19% in Fresno, CA.
Summary
Fresno spends 49.5% more per capita than Minneapolis ($21,477/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $11 |
| Other | $3,254 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $683 | $568 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $1,946 |
| Health | $0 | $599 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $76 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $2,856 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $255 |
| Other | $8,919 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.