Fresno, CA vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Minneapolis, MN by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $21,910, a 98% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Minneapolis, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942 per resident, while Minneapolis, MN leads with parks and recreation at $3,486.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 19% of total revenue in Fresno, CA and 17% in Minneapolis, MN.
Summary
Fresno spends 98.0% more per capita than Minneapolis ($21,477/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $337 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $19 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $501 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | -$4,470 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $11 | $2,040 |
| Other | $2,070 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,261 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $568 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Education | $3,942 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,946 | $1,500 |
| Health | $599 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $76 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $2,856 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $570 |
| Utilities | $15,340 | $2,398 |
| Interest on Debt | $255 | $0 |
| Other | $14,545 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.