Minneapolis, MN vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Colorado Springs, CO by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $13,222, a 66% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Minneapolis, MN edges Colorado Springs, CO on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 65/100 (grade B) to 59/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $3,063 for Colorado Springs, CO. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Minneapolis, MN leads with parks and recreation at $3,486 per resident, while Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Minneapolis, MN at 17% of total revenue, whereas Colorado Springs, CO relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 13%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 65.7% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($8,687/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $257 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $5,676 |
| Other | $3,254 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $683 | $1,266 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $575 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $376 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $2,713 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $190 |
| Other | $8,919 | $5,120 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.