Colorado Springs, CO vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Colorado Springs, CO by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $13,222, a 66% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Minneapolis, MN edges Colorado Springs, CO on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 65/100 (grade B) to 59/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $3,063 for Colorado Springs, CO. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Minneapolis, MN leads with parks and recreation at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Colorado Springs, CO at 13% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 39.7% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($8,687/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $257 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $2,040 |
| Other | $2,678 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $1,500 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $570 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $2,398 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.