Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Minneapolis, MN vs Bakersfield, CA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Minneapolis spends 89.3% more per capita than Bakersfield ($10,334/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Minneapolis, MN
Pop. 426,877
B
65/100
Budget Balance17
Debt Burden91
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency80
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Minneapolis
Bakersfield
Total Spending
$9.4B
$4.7B
Spending / Capita
$21,910
$11,576
Total Revenue
$8.2B
$1.6B
Revenue / Capita
$19,159
$3,862
Total Debt
$274.8M
$0
Debt / Capita
$644
$0
Population
426,877
404,321
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Minneapolis$683
Bakersfield$0
Highways & Roads
Minneapolis$221
Bakersfield$0
Parks & Recreation
Minneapolis$3,486
Bakersfield$741

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

MinneapolisBakersfield
Property Tax
$0
$1
Sales Tax
$1,989
$20
Income Tax
$994
$1,909
Intergovernmental
$2,929
$3,862
Charges & Fees
$2,040
$1,024
Other
$3,254
$1,915

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

MinneapolisBakersfield
Fire Protection
$683
$0
Highways & Roads
$221
$0
Public Welfare
$1,500
$840
Hospitals
$0
$425
Parks & Recreation
$3,486
$741
Housing
$4,133
$3,391
Sewerage
$570
$265
Utilities
$2,398
$2,679
Other
$8,919
$3,234
B
Minneapolis, MN
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities