Bakersfield, CA vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Bakersfield, CA by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $11,576, a 89% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Minneapolis, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Bakersfield, CA — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Bakersfield, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Bakersfield, CA at $741 per resident and in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Bakersfield, CA at 100% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 47.2% more per capita than Bakersfield ($10,334/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $20 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $1,909 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,862 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,024 | $2,040 |
| Other | $1,915 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $840 | $1,500 |
| Hospitals | $425 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $741 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $3,391 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $265 | $570 |
| Utilities | $2,679 | $2,398 |
| Other | $3,234 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.