Milwaukee, WI vs Boston, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Boston, MA outspends Milwaukee, WI by a wide margin per resident — $72,299 versus $19,417, a 272% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Milwaukee, WI edges Boston, MA on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 62/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Milwaukee, WI reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Boston, MA carries $445 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Milwaukee, WI leads with police at $3,642 per resident, while Boston, MA leads with education at $30,742.
They also fund themselves differently: sales tax is the largest single revenue source in Milwaukee, WI at 59% of total revenue, whereas Boston, MA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 17%.
Summary
Boston spends 73.1% more per capita than Milwaukee ($52,882/person difference). Milwaukee, WI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $6,548 | $78 |
| Income Tax | $1 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,231 | $5,357 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,784 |
| Other | $3,984 | $4,557 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,642 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $802 | $1,107 |
| Highways & Roads | $23 | $594 |
| Education | $0 | $30,742 |
| Public Welfare | $180 | $1,110 |
| Health | $1 | $725 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,584 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,206 | $711 |
| Housing | $1,071 | $6,614 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $355 |
| Utilities | $1,866 | $3,402 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,608 | $0 |
| General Admin | $0 | $5,401 |
| Other | $8,018 | $18,955 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.