Boston, MA vs Milwaukee, WI
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Boston, MA outspends Milwaukee, WI by a wide margin per resident — $72,299 versus $19,417, a 272% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Milwaukee, WI edges Boston, MA on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 62/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Milwaukee, WI reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Boston, MA carries $445 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Boston, MA leads with education at $30,742 per resident, while Milwaukee, WI leads with police at $3,642.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Boston, MA at 17% of total revenue, whereas Milwaukee, WI relies most on sales tax at 59%.
Summary
Boston spends 272.3% more per capita than Milwaukee ($52,882/person difference). Milwaukee, WI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $78 | $6,548 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,357 | $1,231 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,784 | $0 |
| Other | $4,557 | $3,984 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,642 |
| Fire Protection | $1,107 | $802 |
| Highways & Roads | $594 | $23 |
| Education | $30,742 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,110 | $180 |
| Health | $725 | $1 |
| Hospitals | $2,584 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $711 | $2,206 |
| Housing | $6,614 | $1,071 |
| Sewerage | $355 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,402 | $1,866 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,608 |
| General Admin | $5,401 | $0 |
| Other | $18,955 | $8,018 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.