Kent, WA vs Everett, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Everett spends 60.3% more per capita than Kent ($15,956/person difference). Everett, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $272 | $362 |
| Income Tax | $89 | $235 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,884 | $4,248 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,797 | $4,469 |
| Other | $4,935 | $6,125 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $413 | $290 |
| Fire Protection | $292 | $1,790 |
| Highways & Roads | -$10 | $251 |
| Public Welfare | $850 | $714 |
| Health | $0 | $379 |
| Hospitals | $207 | $284 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,448 | $1,098 |
| Housing | $3,476 | $3,492 |
| Sewerage | $36 | $268 |
| Utilities | $1,474 | $6,827 |
| Interest on Debt | $1 | $2,198 |
| Other | $2,306 | $8,856 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.