Kent, WA vs Everett, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA outspends Kent, WA by a wide margin per resident — $26,447 versus $10,491, a 152% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Everett, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 67/100 (grade B) against 57/100 (grade C) for Kent, WA — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Everett, WA carries the lighter load at $141 per resident versus $905 for Kent, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Kent, WA leads with parks and recreation at $1,448 per resident, while Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 49% of total revenue in Kent, WA and 24% in Everett, WA.
Summary
Everett spends 60.3% more per capita than Kent ($15,956/person difference). Everett, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $272 | $362 |
| Income Tax | $89 | $235 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,884 | $4,248 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,797 | $4,469 |
| Other | $4,935 | $6,125 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $413 | $290 |
| Fire Protection | $292 | $1,790 |
| Highways & Roads | -$10 | $251 |
| Public Welfare | $850 | $714 |
| Health | $0 | $379 |
| Hospitals | $207 | $284 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,448 | $1,098 |
| Housing | $3,476 | $3,492 |
| Sewerage | $36 | $268 |
| Utilities | $1,474 | $6,827 |
| Interest on Debt | $1 | $2,198 |
| Other | $2,306 | $8,856 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.