Everett, WA vs Kent, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Everett spends 152.1% more per capita than Kent ($15,956/person difference). Everett, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $362 | $272 |
| Income Tax | $235 | $89 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,248 | $1,884 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,469 | $1,797 |
| Other | $6,125 | $4,935 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $290 | $413 |
| Fire Protection | $1,790 | $292 |
| Highways & Roads | $251 | -$10 |
| Public Welfare | $714 | $850 |
| Health | $379 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $284 | $207 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,098 | $1,448 |
| Housing | $3,492 | $3,476 |
| Sewerage | $268 | $36 |
| Utilities | $6,827 | $1,474 |
| Interest on Debt | $2,198 | $1 |
| Other | $8,856 | $2,306 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.