Everett, WA vs Kent, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA outspends Kent, WA by a wide margin per resident — $26,447 versus $10,491, a 152% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Everett, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 67/100 (grade B) against 57/100 (grade C) for Kent, WA — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Everett, WA carries the lighter load at $141 per resident versus $905 for Kent, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790 per resident, while Kent, WA leads with parks and recreation at $1,448.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 24% of total revenue in Everett, WA and 49% in Kent, WA.
Summary
Everett spends 152.1% more per capita than Kent ($15,956/person difference). Everett, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $362 | $272 |
| Income Tax | $235 | $89 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,248 | $1,884 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,469 | $1,797 |
| Other | $6,125 | $4,935 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $290 | $413 |
| Fire Protection | $1,790 | $292 |
| Highways & Roads | $251 | -$10 |
| Public Welfare | $714 | $850 |
| Health | $379 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $284 | $207 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,098 | $1,448 |
| Housing | $3,492 | $3,476 |
| Sewerage | $268 | $36 |
| Utilities | $6,827 | $1,474 |
| Interest on Debt | $2,198 | $1 |
| Other | $8,856 | $2,306 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.