Kansas City, MO vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Kansas City, MO outspends Colorado Springs, CO by a wide margin per resident — $22,820 versus $13,222, a 73% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Colorado Springs, CO edges Kansas City, MO on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 59/100 (grade C) to 52/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Kansas City, MO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Kansas City, MO leads with parks and recreation at $1,309 per resident, while Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Kansas City, MO at 835% of total revenue, whereas Colorado Springs, CO relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 13%.
Summary
Kansas City spends 72.6% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($9,597/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $623 | $257 |
| Intergovernmental | $7 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,794 | $5,676 |
| Other | $11,150 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $119 | $1,266 |
| Public Welfare | $3,018 | $575 |
| Hospitals | $1,849 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,309 | $376 |
| Housing | $4,681 | $2,713 |
| Utilities | $3,123 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $190 |
| Other | $8,721 | $5,120 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.