Colorado Springs, CO vs Kansas City, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Kansas City, MO outspends Colorado Springs, CO by a wide margin per resident — $22,820 versus $13,222, a 73% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Colorado Springs, CO edges Kansas City, MO on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 59/100 (grade C) to 52/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Kansas City, MO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Kansas City, MO leads with parks and recreation at $1,309.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Colorado Springs, CO at 13% of total revenue, whereas Kansas City, MO relies most on other revenue at 835%.
Summary
Kansas City spends 42.1% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($9,597/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $257 | $623 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $7 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $3,794 |
| Other | $2,678 | $11,150 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $119 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $3,018 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $1,849 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $1,309 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $4,681 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $3,123 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $8,721 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.