Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Kansas City, MO vs Bakersfield, CA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Kansas City spends 97.1% more per capita than Bakersfield ($11,244/person difference). Bakersfield, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Kansas City, MO
Pop. 505,958
C
52/100
Budget Balance1
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency76
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Kansas City
Bakersfield
Total Spending
$11.5B
$4.7B
Spending / Capita
$22,820
$11,576
Total Revenue
$675.4M
$1.6B
Revenue / Capita
$1,335
$3,862
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
505,958
404,321
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Kansas City$119
Bakersfield$0
Parks & Recreation
Kansas City$1,309
Bakersfield$741

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Kansas CityBakersfield
Property Tax
$0
$1
Sales Tax
$623
$20
Income Tax
$0
$1,909
Intergovernmental
$7
$3,862
Charges & Fees
$3,794
$1,024
Other
$11,150
$1,915

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Kansas CityBakersfield
Fire Protection
$119
$0
Public Welfare
$3,018
$840
Hospitals
$1,849
$425
Parks & Recreation
$1,309
$741
Housing
$4,681
$3,391
Sewerage
$0
$265
Utilities
$3,123
$2,679
Other
$8,721
$3,234
C
Kansas City, MO
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities