Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Bakersfield, CA vs Kansas City, MO

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Kansas City spends 49.3% more per capita than Bakersfield ($11,244/person difference). Bakersfield, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Kansas City, MO
Pop. 505,958
C
52/100
Budget Balance1
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency76
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Bakersfield
Kansas City
Total Spending
$4.7B
$11.5B
Spending / Capita
$11,576
$22,820
Total Revenue
$1.6B
$675.4M
Revenue / Capita
$3,862
$1,335
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
404,321
505,958
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Bakersfield$0
Kansas City$119
Parks & Recreation
Bakersfield$741
Kansas City$1,309

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BakersfieldKansas City
Property Tax
$1
$0
Sales Tax
$20
$623
Income Tax
$1,909
$0
Intergovernmental
$3,862
$7
Charges & Fees
$1,024
$3,794
Other
$1,915
$11,150

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BakersfieldKansas City
Fire Protection
$0
$119
Public Welfare
$840
$3,018
Hospitals
$425
$1,849
Parks & Recreation
$741
$1,309
Housing
$3,391
$4,681
Sewerage
$265
$0
Utilities
$2,679
$3,123
Other
$3,234
$8,721
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
C
Kansas City, MO
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities