Joliet, IL vs Naperville, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Joliet spends 18.6% more per capita than Naperville ($2,924/person difference). Naperville, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (D, 45/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $323 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $1,006 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $12,066 | $458 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,156 | $4,765 |
| Other | $3,429 | $2,388 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $208 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $165 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $2,118 | $0 |
| Health | $450 | $1,028 |
| Hospitals | $485 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $459 | $544 |
| Housing | $3,292 | $0 |
| Sewerage | $94 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,400 | $4,527 |
| Other | $8,005 | $9,652 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.