Huntsville, AL vs Birmingham, AL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Birmingham, AL outspends Huntsville, AL by a wide margin per resident — $30,790 versus $16,033, a 92% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Huntsville, AL edges Birmingham, AL on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 58/100 (grade C) to 55/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Huntsville, AL carries the lighter load at $1,279 per resident versus $2,823 for Birmingham, AL. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Huntsville, AL at $1,600 per resident and in Birmingham, AL at $1,823.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Huntsville, AL at 10% of total revenue, whereas Birmingham, AL relies most on charges and fees at 13%.
Summary
Birmingham spends 47.9% more per capita than Huntsville ($14,758/person difference). Huntsville, AL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 58/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $44 |
| Sales Tax | $833 | $281 |
| Income Tax | $656 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,511 | $468 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,558 | $10,460 |
| Other | $2,647 | $734 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $22 |
| Fire Protection | $637 | $1,152 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $848 |
| Education | $60 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $708 | $2,110 |
| Health | $354 | $683 |
| Hospitals | $692 | $1,505 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,600 | $1,823 |
| Housing | $2,611 | $5,487 |
| Sewerage | $136 | $594 |
| Utilities | $2,983 | $5,451 |
| Other | $6,253 | $11,115 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.