Birmingham, AL vs Huntsville, AL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Birmingham, AL outspends Huntsville, AL by a wide margin per resident — $30,790 versus $16,033, a 92% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Huntsville, AL edges Birmingham, AL on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 58/100 (grade C) to 55/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Huntsville, AL carries the lighter load at $1,279 per resident versus $2,823 for Birmingham, AL. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Birmingham, AL at $1,823 per resident and in Huntsville, AL at $1,600.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Birmingham, AL at 13% of total revenue, whereas Huntsville, AL relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 10%.
Summary
Birmingham spends 92.0% more per capita than Huntsville ($14,758/person difference). Huntsville, AL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 58/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $44 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $281 | $833 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $656 |
| Intergovernmental | $468 | $4,511 |
| Charges & Fees | $10,460 | $2,558 |
| Other | $734 | $2,647 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $22 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,152 | $637 |
| Highways & Roads | $848 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $60 |
| Public Welfare | $2,110 | $708 |
| Health | $683 | $354 |
| Hospitals | $1,505 | $692 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,823 | $1,600 |
| Housing | $5,487 | $2,611 |
| Sewerage | $594 | $136 |
| Utilities | $5,451 | $2,983 |
| Other | $11,115 | $6,253 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.