Hillsboro, OR vs Gresham, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Hillsboro, OR outspends Gresham, OR by a wide margin per resident — $18,698 versus $10,840, a 73% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Gresham, OR edges Hillsboro, OR on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 46/100 (grade D) to 43/100 (grade D). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Gresham, OR carries the lighter load at $978 per resident versus $8,726 for Hillsboro, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Hillsboro, OR leads with parks and recreation at $3,096 per resident, while Gresham, OR leads with fire protection at $459.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 58% of total revenue in Hillsboro, OR and 100% in Gresham, OR.
Summary
Hillsboro spends 72.5% more per capita than Gresham ($7,859/person difference). Gresham, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (D, 46/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,352 | $28 |
| Sales Tax | $429 | $5 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $69 |
| Intergovernmental | $11,490 | $4,893 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,448 | $1,652 |
| Other | $5,341 | $3,781 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $449 | $459 |
| Highways & Roads | $32 | $184 |
| Education | $206 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,428 | $944 |
| Health | $1,111 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $751 | $662 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,096 | $285 |
| Housing | $4,102 | $2,587 |
| Sewerage | $777 | $57 |
| Utilities | $2,101 | $1,126 |
| Other | $4,645 | $4,537 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.