Gresham, OR vs Hillsboro, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Hillsboro, OR outspends Gresham, OR by a wide margin per resident — $18,698 versus $10,840, a 73% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Gresham, OR edges Hillsboro, OR on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 46/100 (grade D) to 43/100 (grade D). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Gresham, OR carries the lighter load at $978 per resident versus $8,726 for Hillsboro, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Gresham, OR leads with fire protection at $459 per resident, while Hillsboro, OR leads with parks and recreation at $3,096.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Gresham, OR and 58% in Hillsboro, OR.
Summary
Hillsboro spends 42.0% more per capita than Gresham ($7,859/person difference). Gresham, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (D, 46/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $28 | $1,352 |
| Sales Tax | $5 | $429 |
| Income Tax | $69 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,893 | $11,490 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,652 | $4,448 |
| Other | $3,781 | $5,341 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $459 | $449 |
| Highways & Roads | $184 | $32 |
| Education | $0 | $206 |
| Public Welfare | $944 | $1,428 |
| Health | $0 | $1,111 |
| Hospitals | $662 | $751 |
| Parks & Recreation | $285 | $3,096 |
| Housing | $2,587 | $4,102 |
| Sewerage | $57 | $777 |
| Utilities | $1,126 | $2,101 |
| Other | $4,537 | $4,645 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.