Hillsboro, OR vs Beaverton, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Hillsboro, OR spends 57% more per resident than Beaverton, OR: $18,698 against $11,934. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Beaverton, OR edges Hillsboro, OR on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 50/100 (grade C) to 43/100 (grade D). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Beaverton, OR carries the lighter load at $2,344 per resident versus $8,726 for Hillsboro, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Hillsboro, OR leads with parks and recreation at $3,096 per resident, while Beaverton, OR leads with health at $994.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 58% of total revenue in Hillsboro, OR and 100% in Beaverton, OR.
Summary
Hillsboro spends 56.7% more per capita than Beaverton ($6,764/person difference). Beaverton, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 50/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,352 | $25 |
| Sales Tax | $429 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $11,490 | $14,094 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,448 | $2,390 |
| Other | $5,341 | $1,691 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $449 | $268 |
| Highways & Roads | $32 | $0 |
| Education | $206 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,428 | $967 |
| Health | $1,111 | $994 |
| Hospitals | $751 | $455 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,096 | $0 |
| Housing | $4,102 | $3,728 |
| Sewerage | $777 | $406 |
| Utilities | $2,101 | $1,470 |
| Other | $4,645 | $3,645 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.