Beaverton, OR vs Hillsboro, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Hillsboro, OR spends 57% more per resident than Beaverton, OR: $18,698 against $11,934. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Beaverton, OR edges Hillsboro, OR on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 50/100 (grade C) to 43/100 (grade D). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Beaverton, OR carries the lighter load at $2,344 per resident versus $8,726 for Hillsboro, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Beaverton, OR leads with health at $994 per resident, while Hillsboro, OR leads with parks and recreation at $3,096.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Beaverton, OR and 58% in Hillsboro, OR.
Summary
Hillsboro spends 36.2% more per capita than Beaverton ($6,764/person difference). Beaverton, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 50/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $25 | $1,352 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $429 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,094 | $11,490 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,390 | $4,448 |
| Other | $1,691 | $5,341 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $268 | $449 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $32 |
| Education | $0 | $206 |
| Public Welfare | $967 | $1,428 |
| Health | $994 | $1,111 |
| Hospitals | $455 | $751 |
| Parks & Recreation | $0 | $3,096 |
| Housing | $3,728 | $4,102 |
| Sewerage | $406 | $777 |
| Utilities | $1,470 | $2,101 |
| Other | $3,645 | $4,645 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.