Hammond, IN vs Fishers, IN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Hammond, IN outspends Fishers, IN by a wide margin per resident — $25,779 versus $6,900, a 274% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Fishers, IN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 84/100 (grade A) against 67/100 (grade B) for Hammond, IN — a 17-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fishers, IN reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Hammond, IN carries $129 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Hammond, IN at $823 per resident and in Fishers, IN at $655.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Hammond, IN and 61% in Fishers, IN.
Summary
Hammond spends 273.6% more per capita than Fishers ($18,879/person difference). Fishers, IN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 84/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $5 | $101 |
| Intergovernmental | $34,733 | $23,257 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,504 | $0 |
| Other | $8,679 | $2,313 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $789 | $330 |
| Public Welfare | $1,360 | $534 |
| Hospitals | $159 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $823 | $655 |
| Housing | $3,937 | $1,613 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $169 |
| Utilities | $2,592 | $0 |
| Other | $16,119 | $3,599 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.